Mangafanatic wrote:I'm read the Scarlett Letter. Wonderful book.
dareiq s'an wrote:The hobbit its pretty good but a tad childish
uc pseudonym wrote:Similarly, I thought that The Custom House was unnecessary. However, it was added to increase the page count of the original novel to a more acceptable level by the original publisher. At least I am fairly certain that is the case.
uc pseudonym wrote:Currently, I am reading The Mouse that Roared by Leonard Wibberley. From my initial impressions, it shows a great deal of promise as an interesting satirical novel.
uc pseudonym wrote:Currently, I am reading The Mouse that Roared by Leonard Wibberley. From my initial impressions, it shows a great deal of promise as an interesting satirical novel.
uc pseudonym wrote:
For a course, I will be reading Oscar Wilde's The Importance of Being Earnest. He earned my respect with The Picture of Dorian Gray but we'll see how I like this.
Ducky wrote:As to Oscar Wilde, he lost my respect with Dorian. The writing wasn't particularly bad, and the main plot was actually quite good. The strong homosexual undertones bothered me a little bit though, especially when viewed within a context of Wilde's views on such and my homosexual classmate's reaction to the book ... all in all I don't care for him.
uc pseudonym wrote:I will point out that I highly recommend this book. The time from my last post has been quite busy, and yet I have still read through 80% of the book. It is similar to the Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy in that you do not want to put it down, though the humor is more satiric and generally far more pointed.
For a course, I will be reading Oscar Wilde's The Importance of Being Earnest. He earned my respect with The Picture of Dorian Gray but we'll see how I like this.
uc pseudonym wrote:I completed Earnest today. A thoroughly trivial play, but one that is so quite cleverly. It was an interesting read, at the very least.
What makes me think regarding The Mouse That Roared is the scientific concept of quadium. I spent some time wondering how much of it was fact, how much was theory and how much was purely fantasy. If fantasy, they did a good job of creating a doom-weapon premise that didn't ruin suspension of disbelief.
Mave wrote:I'm taking on the Origin of Species by Charles Darwin starting this week. I'm curious about the whole evolution topic and thought I might as well begin with the book that most probably kicked off everything.
Technomancer wrote:It's a worthwhile read, but a bit plodding in parts. Darwin is very repetetive in offering examples, but does make his point well (albeit over and over again). The material is easy to grasp of course, since he wrote it so that any horsebreeder could have understood it. His 'Voyage of the Beagle' BTW was a far better read IMO, but lacked the significance of his later work.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 26 guests