cbwing0 wrote:furs?
![Stressed :stressed:](./images/smilies/stressed.gif)
We are talking about SomethingAwful.com, right?
Yes, SA is the anti-fur/anti-furry* capital of teh internet, and being a fur means that they're all out to kill me.
* The distinction between a fur and a furry should be made. Furries are nuts who share one or more of the following ideas/atributes: a) the belief that their soul is actually truly an animal spirit, b) fursuits and bodypaints, c) "yiff" anything that breathes (and oft stuff that doesn't), d) often include howls, barks, roars, chirps, and other such noises in their every-day vocabulary (online and off), e) known for their love of drama (eg, cutting themselves when people "steal" the art they posted on the net would be an example. More often they'll just cry and give webmasters a hard time and might even throw in the word "lawsuit"), f) feel that a good fursona must contain wings that would be unnatural for the speci they have chosen, oversized bangs, outrageous colors in their natural hair color, g) like the idea of having 2 tails (I call this MTP syndrome and a free cookie to anyone who can tell me why), h) play Furcadia. The list is longer than this, but these are what I consider to be the basics. Considering these things, SA has every right to be anti-furry. But furs are different in that they do none of the above things, or at most very few of them and on rare occasions. This is why it's stupid that SA groups furs and furries together in one colective group, which is why my wish that it remains dead still stands
![Grin :grin:](./images/smilies/grin.gif)